AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
The angry birds movie 2 imp awards3/16/2024 That increased flexibility mostly works to the film’s benefit, with Van Orman and the writers investing in more elaborate, inspired comic setpieces without referential in-jokery. We’re free, then, to drift into story worlds and digressions with nary a trace of the source material’s DNA, even as the plush, fluorescent finish of the animation (a gaudy-but-gorgeous alternative to Disney-Pixar refinement) keeps things true to the original game’s eye-scorching aesthetic. Where its predecessor contorted itself to work the game’s essential imagery and strategy into a shaggy narrative, the sequel persuasively cements the films as a franchise in their own right. How close “The Angry Birds Movie 2” comes to matching that figure will depend on how firmly the first film’s characters - considerably fleshed (or feathered) out from rudimentary smartphone avatars - have captured the collective imagination of a young public now a micro-generation removed from the game’s pop-cultural peak. Despite a complete replacement of the first film’s writing and directing teams - with acclaimed, offbeat TV animator Thurop Van Orman brashly taking the reins in his first feature assignment - this second loopy adventure for misfit cardinal Red and his feathered-but-flightless friends maintains the balance of scattergun jokes, candy-coated visuals and cheerfully bird-brained storytelling that raked in $350 million worldwide in 2016. Peace of any kind is in short supply in “ The Angry Birds Movie 2,” another breathless, frenetic cartoon escapade derived from the once-ubiquitous video game franchise, and again its manic, catapulting comic energy is more appealing than those origins might suggest. There's just not enough here to truly engage you.“For every minute you remain angry, you give up sixty seconds of peace of mind,” wrote Ralph Waldo Emerson - though he reckoned without the Angry Birds making a virtue of that trade. This isn't Pixar so I can't recommend that anyone with a driver's license watch it on their own, but if you get pulled into it for a family movie night or something it is sporadically amusing. Particularly as far as the youngsters are concerned. However, Angry Birds 2 shows that two out of three ain't bad. I also caught myself cracking up every now and then at the occasional clever one-liner or bit of slapstick.Ī truly great animated film would leave you gawking at the beauty of its animation, rolling on the floor at it's comedy, and pondering over the complexities of its narrative. The entire stretch with the eagle disguise is nothing short of pure gold and had me guffawing to the point where I could barely breathe. That's because Angry Birds 2 covers a wide array of humor in an effort to fill every single second with a joke of some kind. That kind of stuff didn't make me laugh back in the day and it doesn't get to me now.Īs hit or miss as it may be the older you get, it's still guaranteed to tickle your funny bone at some point or another. Plus, for the life of me I'll never understand how men in thongs and just butts in general have become the height of prepubescent comedy. For example, during a speed dating event one of the main trio boldly declares to a potential partner that he "eats dirt." He then proceeds to open his mouth and sure enough it's full of dirt. Adults on the other hand will likely struggle with just how irreverent it all is. So it has its target audience in the bag. I doubt there's a kid alive that wouldn't find this absolutely hilarious. None of this matters too much though as children's films like this tend to live or die by how funny they are, rather than things like the actual quality of the writing. They're at least given something of an arc to grow and learn from while the rest just act goofy or stupid the entire time. As a result, Red and his love interest Silver are the only ones who feel important in any way, shape, or form. The majority of the returning side-characters are given so little to do that the only reason I can think of as to why they were brought back is because they had significant roles in the first one, and the new additions, villainous or otherwise, fail to make much of an impression. In fact, it's so light on plot that they had to splice in cutaways to what is essentially an animated short in order to reach feature length. Angry Birds 2 is most definitely the latter. There are seemingly two major kinds of animated movies those that are concerned with telling a good story, and those that just want to make people laugh at ridiculous humor.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |